menu AICodingPricing

Compare Coding Models by Workflow Cost

Compare coding LLMs by source-backed evidence, API pricing, caveats, and estimated task cost. Unknowns stay visible.

Claude Opus 4.5

ANTHROPIC
partial

SWE-BENCH

76.80%

CONTEXT

Not disclosed

PRICING (1M TOKENS)

IN: $5.00 OUT: $25.00
SOURCE: DOCS

Strong evidence; expensive output price

Claude Sonnet 4.5

ANTHROPIC
partial

SWE-BENCH

71.40%

CONTEXT

Not disclosed

PRICING (1M TOKENS)

IN: $3.00 OUT: $15.00
SOURCE: DOCS

Good candidate; caveat visible

Gemini 3 Flash

GOOGLE
partial

SWE-BENCH

75.80%

CONTEXT

Not disclosed

PRICING (1M TOKENS)

IN: not disclosed OUT: not disclosed
SOURCE: API

Benchmark visible; price/context need exact source

DeepSeek V4 Flash

DEEPSEEK
partial

SWE-BENCH

not publicly benchmarked

CONTEXT

1,000,000

PRICING (1M TOKENS)

IN: $0.14 OUT: $0.28
SOURCE: API

Cheap token price; exact coding benchmark not verified

RECOMMENDED WORKFLOWS

AGENTIC WORKFLOW

I'm building a coding agent

Prioritize public coding evidence, source-backed pricing, retry risk, and caveat visibility.

BATCH PROCESS

Repo-level refactor

Prioritize source-backed context, editing evidence, and caveats about effective long-context reliability.

Our Methodology

verified
INTEGRITY

Raw provider data only.

account_balance
ECONOMICS

Real-world task math.

fact_check
CURATION

Official or public sources only.

visibility
TRANSPARENCY

Open citation sources.

warning

UNKNOWN VALUE POLICY

Models without exact public coding evidence stay partial or not publicly benchmarked until verified.