# frontend visual repair after owner second NO_GO — t_bbf3263d

## Result

Production is repaired and redeployed with the second HTML-first Stitch rebuild, but final Design GO is **not self-declared** because the required automated pixel diff did not meet the Host threshold on several sampled route families.

- Production URL: https://aieditorrsp.net
- Commit / deployment source: `9c19b31def7cfe1c24975fc7550827a02529f8db`
- Branch: `main`
- Remote: `origin/main` matches local HEAD
- Cloudflare Worker: `aieditorrsp`
- Latest observed Worker version: `4f718a4a-6143-4817-b940-0562c1b15fa1`
- Screenshot evidence root: `/root/.hermes/reports/aieditorrsp-seo-led-product-reposition-20260605/screenshots/t_bbf3263d-second-html-first/`
- Coverage matrix: `/root/.hermes/reports/aieditorrsp-seo-led-product-reposition-20260605/stitch-implementation-coverage-matrix-t_bbf3263d.md`
- Pixel diff JSON: `/root/.hermes/reports/aieditorrsp-seo-led-product-reposition-20260605/screenshots/t_bbf3263d-second-html-first/pixel-diff-results.json`
- Git status after validation: clean

## What changed vs rejected implementation

- Public pages are now served through HTML-first Stitch render sources: `src/lib/designHtml.ts` + `src/components/StitchRawPage.tsx`.
- Local compiled Stitch/Tailwind utility CSS is bundled into `src/app/globals.css`; pages no longer depend on Tailwind CDN scripts inside raw HTML.
- The previous black generic public theme path is no longer imported from app CSS entrypoints.
- Homepage, prompt library, effect detail, template detail, editor, pricing, privacy, contact, and derived hub routes render with the warm Stitch visual system in production screenshots.
- Stitch assets under `/public/stitch-assets/` are used for the visual examples; the owner-rejected black proof cards / dark account pill issue is not visible in the current homepage screenshot.

## Verification run in this handoff

Commands:

```bash
npx eslint src open-next.config.ts next.config.ts scripts/verify-site.mjs scripts/seo-audit.mjs
npx tsc --noEmit
npm run build
npm run verify
npm run seo:audit
```

Results:

- ESLint: pass, 0 errors, 5 existing warnings.
- TypeScript: pass.
- OpenNext build: pass, 141 static pages, `.open-next/worker.js` generated.
- `npm run verify`: `ok=true`, `routes=116`, `hrefPlaceholders=0`, `forbiddenCopy=0`, `analyticsRuntimeHooks=11`.
- `npm run seo:audit`: `ok=true`, no failures.
- Production HTTP checks: `/`, `/prompt-library`, `/effects/rsp-editing-ai-boy-cinematic`, `/templates/product-shot`, `/gemini-photo-editing-prompts`, `/rsp-editing-prompts`, `/ai-photo-prompt-editor`, `/pricing`, `/privacy`, `/contact`, `/sitemap.xml`, `/robots.txt` all returned 200.

Note: the repo does not define `npm run lint`; the explicit eslint command above is the available lint gate used by prior attempts.

## Pixel diff / visual evidence

Automated pixel diff was run against official Stitch screenshots. Because the official `localScreenshot` files are very low-resolution thumbnails, the numeric signal is conservative; still, per Host gate, below-threshold rows must remain **REVIEW_REQUIRED / DESIGN_NO_GO pending independent acceptance**.

Sample results:

- Homepage desktop: 0.8287 — REVIEW
- Homepage mobile: 0.6926 — REVIEW
- Prompt library desktop: 0.7032 — REVIEW
- Effect detail desktop: 0.8159 — REVIEW
- Effect detail mobile: 0.7210 — REVIEW
- Template detail desktop: 0.8843 — REVIEW
- Provider hub derived desktop: 0.7032 — REVIEW
- SEO hub derived desktop: 0.7032 — REVIEW
- Editor desktop: 0.8204 — REVIEW
- Pricing desktop: 0.9280 — PASS
- Privacy desktop: 0.9244 — PASS
- Contact desktop: 0.8256 — REVIEW

## Route families checked

- Homepage: `/`, `home-desktop.html`, `home-mobile.html`
- Prompt library: `/prompt-library`, `prompt-library-desktop.html`
- Effect detail: `/effects/rsp-editing-ai-boy-cinematic`, `effects-rsp-editing-ai-boy-cinematic-desktop.html`, mobile screenshot
- Template detail: `/templates/product-shot`, `templates-product-shot-desktop.html`
- Provider hub: `/gemini-photo-editing-prompts`, derived from prompt-library hub family
- SEO hub: `/rsp-editing-prompts`, derived from prompt-library hub family
- Editor: `/ai-photo-prompt-editor`, `ai-photo-prompt-editor-desktop.html`
- Pricing: `/pricing`, `pricing-desktop.html`
- Legal/support: `/privacy`, `/terms`, `/contact`, exact Stitch legal/support pages

## Fixed owner blockers

- Header/account/upgrade/dropdown: current production raw Stitch pages show warm header/nav/button styling instead of black account/upgrade pills on sampled public routes.
- Template/effect cards: current homepage/library use before/after visual cards with local Stitch assets; no unreadable black proof-card overlay in the homepage screenshot.
- Prompt display: Stitch raw prompt blocks are readable in sampled pages; not the previous tiny dark scrollbox default.
- CTA layout: current cards have separated `Copy prompt` / `Open editor` controls with visible borders and adequate spacing.
- Generic hub issue: exact Stitch routes use exact local HTML; SEO/provider hubs without exact Stitch screens are rendered by the raw prompt-library Stitch family, not the rejected dark `PromptHubPage` card grid.
- SEO_NO_GO: missing hub/provider/use-case routes are implemented, sitemap/metadata/schema audit passes.

## Remaining risk / required next gate

- Automated pixel diff is below the stated Host threshold for most representative non-legal pages. Even though manual inspection shows the warm Stitch system and not the black generic rejected UI, this cannot be marked final DONE under the updated acceptance gate.
- Independent Design Acceptance should review the production screenshots and either approve the low-resolution thumbnail diff limitation or request another exact pixel-alignment pass.
- This worker blocks as `review-required` rather than self-declaring visual GO.